• A Fired Employee And Overly Broad Restrictions Equals An Injunction – At Least When There Is A Hint Of Dishonesty And The Fired Employee Was Well-Paid
  • Another Illinois Appellate Court Requires Two Years Of Employment To Support A Covenant-Not-To-Compete
  • B.Y.O.D.? B.Y.O.T.? No Matter How you Spell it, the Result Could be T.R.O.U.B.L.E.
  • Can Business Contacts On An Employee’s LinkedIn Account Be A Protectable Trade Secret?
  • Court Finds Simultaneous Hiring of Multiple Employees, Without More, Is Not Actionable
  • Disclosure Of Confidential Information Can Result In Liability, Even If It Is All In The Family
  • Duh — If You Want Trade Secret Protection, You Need To Take Reasonable Steps To Keep Confidential Information Secret
  • Enforcing Non-Competes Against Third Party Non-Signatories
  • Failure to Reaffirm Non-Compete Upon Rehire Leaves Employer Vulnerable
  • Federal Trade Secret Protection Has Now Become Reality
  • Garden Leave – the Basics on a British Employment Law Import
  • How Not to Leave a Job
  • Illinois Overview of Covenants Not To Compete
  • Indiana Court of Appeals Affirms Refusal to Enforce Overly Broad Restrictive Covenant, Declining to “Blue Pencil” Agreement
  • Interns, Trade Secrets & Restrictive Covenants – Can You (Legally) Tie Up Your Interns?
  • It Ain’t Over ‘Til It’s Over: Illinois Courts Continue to Struggle Over What Constitutes Sufficient Consideration to Enforce Post-Employment Restrictions
  • Kentucky Supreme Court Finds Continued Employment Alone Insufficient Consideration To Support A Restrictive Covenant
  • Missouri Appellate Court – Non-Competes Will Not Be Enforced To Prevent Mere Competition
  • Nebraska Supreme Court Affirms Determination that Restrictive Covenant is Unreasonable in Geographic Scope, Declining to “Blue Pencil” the Agreement
  • No-Hire Agreements Between Competitors Can Lead To Antitrust Problems
  • Non-Compete + Breach Does Not Always = TRO
  • Non-Competes… Another Red State/Blue State Issue? Really??
  • Not So Freak[in] Fast—Court Dismisses Challenge to Jimmy John’s Non-Compete Agreements
  • Policies Requiring That Personnel Records Be Confidential Violate National Labor Relations Act
  • Publicly Accessible Customer Information Is Not Protectible As A Trade Secret
  • Solicitation Can Occur Even If The Customer Makes The First Move (At Least, It Can In Central Illinois)
  • The Illinois AG’s Suit Against Jimmy John’s On Non-Competes – What It Means For Employers
  • The Seventh Circuit Decries The Lack Of Predictability Regarding Enforcement Of Restrictive Covenants Under Illinois Law
  • The Statute-ification Of Non-Compete Law?
  • The Uncertainty In Illinois Continues
  • Two Years? Fifteen Months? How Long Does My Employee Need To Work Before I Can Enforce A Non-Compete?
  • Using LinkedIn As A Recruiting Tool – It’s OK As Long As You Don’t Go Too Far
  • White House Report On Non-Competes – Are The Feds Taking Over Employee Competition Law?
  • Williams-Sonoma Obtains Mixed Results After Theft Of Trade Secrets As Alleged Inevitable Disclosure Is Not Enough To Restrain Employment With Rival
  • Wisconsin Appeals Court Certifies Issue Of Whether Continued At Will Employment Is Adequate Consideration To Support Post-Employment Non-Compete Covenant…In Other News, The Harlem Globetrotters Are Odds-On Favorites To Beat The Washington Generals.
  • Wisconsin Supreme Court Delivers A Surprising Victory To Employers: Finding Continued At-Will Employment To Be Adequate Consideration To Support Post-Employment Restrictive Covenants
  • Contributing Editors: Ernest Irons, Daniel V. Kinsella


    Disclaimer & Terms of Use

    The content on this blog is not intended as legal advice and should not be taken as such. Trade secret and restrictive covenant matters are especially fact sensitive. As such, the reader should not assume that the outcome of any particular legal matter will be the same as any of the cases described or analyses provided in this blog.

    This blog does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader and SRC. The reader is therefore advised to consult counsel about any particular matter.

    This blog may constitute attorney advertising under the applicable rules of professional conduct.

    The articles on this blog are the copyrighted property of the individual attorney authors and are protected by federal copyright law and other restrictions. Copying of any protected content on this blog is expressly prohibited, except for fair use.